Rene Descartes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Rene Descartes - Essay ExampleI think, hence I am, this is so indisputable and of such evidence that no filth of doubt, however extravagant, could be alleged by the skeptics confident of shaking it, therefore I concluded that I might, without scruple, accept it as the first principle of the philosophy of which I was in search.(Descartes, 1989, p30) This is fair enough from a depth psychological perspective. Although mental energy (particularly archetypal energy) is more usually regarded as Jungian Depth Psychologys first point due to psychic energy being primordial and universal. It is the view of Jungians that it took millenias of human psychological evolution to produce humans like Descartes who are capable of such great attentitive, focused, reflective thought. Nevertheless, for Descartes, he was primarily focused on this own individual self, and for that reason his starting point is accepted here. Thus what I thought I had seen with my eyes, I actually grasped solely with th e faculty of judgment, which is in my mind.(Descartes)We can be certain of psychic reality. We can be largely certain of much physical reality but what Descartes is saying here, is that outer objects may not be seen as they unfeignedly are. We have no way of knowing. We cannot nettle beyond human limitations. Where Jungian Depth Psychology parts from Descartes is in limiting his thinking to one subject directed consciousness thinking. But ahead coming to that we can briefly state what is positive in this Cartesian method. It has already been noted that it took millenias of evolution to slip away the stage where one could reflect, think, be engrossed and focused in the way that Descartes was. Because for Descartes, the true way of living was to think. A thinking thing essential think in order to be healthy. For... Rene Descartes was a major philosopher of the seventeenth century, belonging to the school of continental saneism. Descartes sets out in his Discourse on Method to doubt all that could be doubted, albeit not to halt up believing in nothing, but rather so that he would believe in only that which really was true. We can be certain of psychic reality. We can be largely certain of much physical reality but what Descartes is saying here, is that outer objects may not be seen as they really are. We have no way of knowing. We cannot get beyond human limitations. Where Jungian Depth Psychology parts from Descartes is in limiting his thinking to one type directed consciousness thinking. But before coming to that we can briefly state what is positive in this Cartesian method. It has already been noted that it took millennias of evolution to reach the stage where one could reflect, think, be attentive and focused in the way that Descartes was. Because for Descartes, the true way of living was to think. A thinking thing must think in order to be healthy. For Descartes, this thinking must be free from passion and prejudice if it is to be healthy and if it is to operate with perfect rational clarity and thereby attain certain knowledge. Descartes (as good as) perfects directed thinking appropriate to his pre-Freud and pre Jung time and place.